Shady donors from Obama to Clinton

I have two problems with the donations both Hilarly and Barack have so graciously donated to un name Charities.
1. Technically: When they did not give the money back directly to the person they became a fiducuary for these people.
2. Giving the money to charity should not end the questions concerning relationship.

Since, both situations were people with foreign ties questions should have been asked surrounding that area.

However the questions were not ask by the major news agencies which raise the question the seperation of the news and politics.

In Clinton case the money had asian ties. Is our country for sale?

In OBama the money has Syrian Ties. Is our country already bought?

Why are these questions are being asked.

In Obama's Case both donators are indicted and being prosecuted as we speak. However, I suspect that as more powerful Obama gets the less likely we will be to hearing the truth. We know our famed anti-news news agencies of Cnn, Foxnews, and Msnbc will not even try.

Obama's donors are proven arm twisters who practice was to use donations as a business practice. All of their donations to politicians appear to be a business practice to curry contracts.

Obama'a donors also had Syrian ties in respect to his birthplace and middle east which is directly from his indictment and his apparent source of bond money.

The point is now what we know, but dont know.

Is it unseemingly, and really poor timing for Obama. Yes. Should we not want ansers to these questions, and should we not ask even more question.

After all when we vote for president, we vote for America, and not a pretty face.

I understand that its not fair to a honest politician. But they have duty to screen and to make sure they are not victims. After we would not want a president being black mail because he did not vet is campaign dollars well enough. Can imagine a conversation were we are about to rule in the U.N. against a country and the presidents finds out he was partially elected through that countries donations. That is a unteniable positon for the president, senator, congressman and even a governer to be in and he has a resoponsibility to make sure it does not happen.

And. It is the citizens to weather the unseemingly news that goes along with making sure or leaders are not tainted.

Finally it really disturbs me that atleast 3 democratic candidates and one democratic president had receive dollars from people that has ties, and not hidden but loose ties to foreign countries.

Finally ...the heck with editing.....today...and excuse any grammatical errors I have made today.